备注：已完结
类型：喜剧片
主演：安德鲁·斯科特 布莱恩·格里森 艾米·胡伯曼 休·奥康纳 彼得·麦克唐
导演：约翰·巴特勒
语言：英语
年代：未知
简介：A group of male friends embark on an Irish stag party.一群单身汉在单身汉舞会. 这是一部关于描述男性友谊的爱尔兰喜剧。这部剧实际上有一点反单身的意味。对很多男性来讲，保持单身的想法是非常可怕的，这也是这部电影想要表达的东西。所以这会是一部非常欢乐的电影。根据 The Irish Examiner的报道Hugh O'Connor 将要扮演新郎。爱尔兰女演员Amy Huberman将出演准新娘。Andrew Scott 将在本片中扮演伴郎一角。（改自AS在Radio Times的采访）
备注：已完结
类型：喜剧片
主演：萨尔曼·汗 索娜什·辛哈 缇努·阿南德 玛拉伊卡·阿罗拉 Mahie
语言：其它
年代：未知
简介：齐尔布（萨尔曼·汗 Salman Khan 饰）是警界里一朵奇葩。正义感爆棚的他常常单枪匹马的闯入犯罪现场，大展身手将犯罪分子们捉拿归案。虽然齐尔布是市民们眼中捍卫和平的保护神，但在警长切迪的眼中，这个不按常理出牌的下属显然是警局里的超级不安定因素。不仅如此，齐尔布的存在亦给切迪贪污受贿的行径带来了不少阻挠。 一次偶然中，齐尔布邂逅了名为伊柔塔（索娜什·辛哈 Sonakshi Sinha 饰）的美丽女孩，瞬间坠入了情网，很快两人就走到了一起。齐尔布有一个不成器的弟弟马奇，某日，被马奇虐待的工人找到了齐尔布，向他控诉马奇的罪行，愤怒的齐尔布当街胖揍了弟弟一顿，没想到却因此被一直想要解决他的切迪抓住了把柄。
备注：已完结
类型：喜剧片
主演：朱丽叶塔·马西纳 桑德拉·米洛 马里奥·皮苏 瓦伦蒂娜·格特斯 瓦勒斯
导演：费德里科·费里尼
语言：其它
年代：未知
简介：费里尼拍摄了另一部自传性很强的电影《朱丽叶与魔鬼》，在这部电影里，费里尼过分追求求神秘主义的梦境空间，在影片里极尽详能的描述描写一个资产阶级的女人遭到丈夫的欺骗，精神迷惘，陷于离奇古怪的幻觉，最后终于清醒的故事。虽然费里尼和茱莉埃妲两人携手共度一生，而且费里尼也从来没有传出与其他女人的诽闻，但是我想所有对费里尼非常熟悉的影迷都不相信费里尼从没有出轨的行为。尤其在看了这部电影之后，因为在费里尼的电影中充分的表现出费里尼是一个性欲旺盛且对女人充满遐想的导演，他甚至在他的男人外遇只是把自己的性器官借给别人用一下罢了，并没有出卖自己的灵魂。或者这正是费里尼的迷人之处吧，他永远是神秘的，让人无法捉摸的。
备注：已完结
类型：喜剧片
主演：Yelena Tsyplakova 伊戈尔·斯克利亚尔 Aleksan
语言：其它
年代：未知
简介：有人戏称这部电影是“四个男人的一台戏”。 影片中基本没有特别引人的情节，没有激烈的动作打斗场面，甚至没有撩人心弦的爱情故事，然而绕有趣味的是，影片除却赢得了1700万观众，还被当时权威电影杂志《苏联银幕》评为1983年最佳影片。 这样一部既叫座又叫好的影片讲述了前苏联20年代四个青年音乐家组办爵士乐队的故事。在那样一个“火红的年代”，属于“资本主义意识形态”的爵士乐很难被苏联官方接受。出现在影片中几乎所有文化场合的标语“艺术要为劳动人民服务！”是那个时代的典型象征。四个热爱爵士乐的青年就这样不合时宜、一波三折地进行着他们“不可能完成的任务”。 影片拍摄完成的80年代，苏联人已经开始通过一些“非法渠道”接触西方文化，当时，《巴黎最后的探戈》录像带开始半地下流行，持不同政见歌手的音乐会也几乎场场爆满。因此，在这样一种社会背景下影片中发生的故事立刻能得到观众的认同，主人公们对理想的执着、对自我价值的肯定、对友谊的坚持也让人感觉亲近和鼓舞。 影片运用幽默诙谐的手法对时代进行嘲讽，用优美的音乐旋律和舞蹈动作打动观众，一个本应沉重的题材得以让人轻松地内省。 导演卡·沙赫纳扎罗夫、编剧亚·巴拉基杨斯基、摄影弗·舍弗兹伊克构成了一个强力组合， 剧本经过10次修改，人物性格设计上的差异赋予了演员极大的发挥空间。透视片中时代里的个体、音乐里的个性，我们看到一种俄罗斯哲学的智慧。或许有一天，你已经忘记了影片故事的情节，但是某些掺杂着辛酸与甜蜜、沮丧与欣喜的电影画面会在脑海中悄然浮现。 影片获1984年法国格勒诺布尔国际音乐片电影节评委会特别奖，波兰罗兹国际电影节银奖，并参展1984年伦敦、芝加哥、贝尔格莱德等电影节。
备注：已完结
类型：喜剧片
主演：Matthew Broderick Jeanne Tripplehor
导演：沃伦·莱特
语言：英语
年代：未知
简介：Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
